Koala alternatives
Koala has been acquired by Cursor and shuts down on September 30, 2026, so this is not a shopping list: every Koala customer has to move. What you move to depends on which of Koala's three jobs you actually used — the visitor feed in Slack, account-level intent scoring, or in-product signals for a product-led motion.
Reviewed by Théo Pascard, Co-founder · Updated September 2026
Quick answer
If Koala was your Slack feed of who is on the site, RB2B is the closest swap for US traffic, and Warmly if you want the fuller platform and have the budget. If you used it to score which accounts are in market, Factors.ai does account intelligence and intent analytics from $199/mo, and Snitcher or Leadfeeder cover company-level identification for less. If you sell to developers, Reo.Dev reads the signals Koala never saw. No tool in our catalog replaces Koala's in-product scoring one for one — plan for that gap rather than expecting a like-for-like switch.
The shortlist
| Tool | Best when | Starting price | Pricing | Market rating | Our experience |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RB2B | You used Koala as a Slack feed of who is on your site | Free, then $79/mo | Free tier, then paid | 4.5/5 (283) | Operated |
| Warmly | You want the whole platform, not just a feed | From $10000/yr | Monthly subscription | 4.5/5 (250) | Operated |
| Factors.ai | You used Koala to score which accounts are in market | From $199/mo | Monthly subscription | 4.5/5 (194) | Tested |
| Snitcher | You only need the company-level feed, cheaply | From $49/mo | Usage-based | 4.8/5 (221) | Tested |
| Leadfeeder | Your buyers are in Europe | Free, then €79/mo | Free tier, then paid | 4.3/5 (861) | Operated |
| Reo.Dev | You sell developer tools or infrastructure | Quote only | Quote only | 4.9/5 (73) | Researched |
Prices and ratings come from each tool's own review page. Market rating is the public review average; the Enjyn Score is our own grading.
RB2B
Free, then $79/mo · Enjyn Score 9.0/10
The same Slack-first workflow, naming the person rather than only the account on US traffic. The free plan only names companies; the person-level feed starts on Starter at $79/mo, and business emails and integrations on Pro at $149/mo.
Watch out. United States coverage, and no product-usage signals at all. If Koala's value came from what users did inside your app, this replaces only the website half.
Full RB2B review →Warmly
From $10000/yr · Enjyn Score 9.0/10
Person-level de-anonymization with intent layered on top and autonomous agents working inbound and outbound. It is the most complete replacement for teams that used Koala to trigger plays, not just to watch traffic.
Watch out. Annual, enterprise-style pricing from $10,000 a year, and reviewers report bugs and integration friction as the platform scales. A big step up from Koala's $200 Starter.
Full Warmly review →Factors.ai
From $199/mo · Enjyn Score 9.0/10
Website identification, marketing analytics and intent signals — including LinkedIn and G2 — combined to surface engaging accounts and attribute pipeline. The closest match to Koala's account-intent side.
Watch out. It surfaces accounts, not contacts, and smaller plans cap features. Value depends on having enough traffic and channel activity to analyze.
Full Factors.ai review →Snitcher
From $49/mo · Enjyn Score 9.6/10
Identifies the companies on your site and their behaviour, routes the signals to sales or your CRM, and prices on the number of companies identified, from $49/mo with every feature included.
Watch out. Companies, not people: you still need contact data and outreach to act on what it finds.
Full Snitcher review →Leadfeeder
Free, then €79/mo · Enjyn Score 8.6/10
Company-level identification with intent scoring and alerts, strong GDPR-compliant European coverage and a free Lite tier, then paid plans from €79/mo.
Watch out. Company-level by design. If Koala named individuals for you, this is a step back in granularity.
Full Leadfeeder review →Reo.Dev
Quote only · Enjyn Score 9.8/10
Turns developer activity — GitHub, package managers, documentation usage and website visits — into company and person-level buying signals. For technical products it catches the in-market engineers a website pixel never sees.
Watch out. No public price, and reviewers call it expensive for small teams with a real ramp-up. It only pays off if your buyers leave a developer footprint.
Full Reo.Dev review →Our take. Do not rebuy Koala by reflex. Before September 30, look at which Koala signals your reps actually acted on over the last quarter: if it was the Slack feed of visiting people, RB2B or Warmly replace it; if it was account scoring, Factors.ai; if nobody acted on either, cancelling is a valid answer and the migration is a chance to stop paying for a dashboard. The one thing none of these rebuilds out of the box is Koala's in-product intent for product-led teams — if that was the core, budget for wiring product events into your CRM rather than expecting a visitor-identification tool to do it.
Frequently asked questions
Is Koala shutting down?
Yes. Koala's site announces that it has been acquired by Cursor and will shut down on September 30, 2026 (banner read on September 18, 2026). Plan the migration before that date so your routing rules and Slack alerts do not simply go silent.
What is the closest replacement for Koala?
It depends on the job. For the Slack feed of website visitors, RB2B on US traffic; for account-level intent, Factors.ai; for a fuller platform with agents, Warmly. None replicates Koala's product-usage scoring one for one.
Is there a free Koala alternative?
Partly. RB2B's free plan identifies companies in Slack, and Leadfeeder has a free Lite tier, both at company level. Naming individual visitors is paid everywhere in this list: RB2B from $79/mo.
What replaces Koala for product-led teams?
Nothing in our catalog does in-product intent the way Koala did. Developer-focused teams can look at Reo.Dev for activity signals; others usually send product events to their CRM and score there.
Not sure what should replace it
We run outbound stacks for B2B teams and pick tools by what they cost per result, not by the pitch.
Book a GTM audit