vs
Enrow vs Icypeas
Two narrow email finders with no G2 score between them. The real difference is what you pay for: a result, or a credit.
Reviewed by Théo Pascard, Co-founder · Updated October 2026
Quick answer
Enrow charges a credit only when it returns a valid, verified address, and runs a waterfall across several data providers; its Start plan is 15 EUR a month for 1,000 credits on annual billing, and it plugs into Clay. Icypeas sells flat credit packs, $19 a month for 1,000 and $89 for 10,000, with credits that roll over indefinitely, catch-all verification and a domain scan. Pick Enrow if you want cost tied to results inside an enrichment stack. Pick Icypeas if you want a plain, cheap credit pack you can leave unused for months.
Side by side
| Enrow | Icypeas | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pay-on-success email finding and verification | Affordable email finding and verification at scale |
| Category | Data Enrichment | Email Finder |
| Pricing model | Credits | Credits |
| Starting price | From €15/mo | From $19/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Real cost per work email | $0.0173 | $0.019 |
| Real cost per mobile | $0.86 | Not sold |
| Billing model | Pay-on-success: a credit only for a valid, verified email | Flat credit packs, rolled over indefinitely |
| Entry paid plan | 15 EUR/mo for 1,000 credits (annual billing) | $19/mo for 1,000 credits |
| 10,000 credits | 75 EUR/mo on Pro (annual billing) | $89/mo on Advanced |
| Free start | 50 credits, no card | No free plan listed |
| Market rating | Not enough public reviews | Not enough public reviews |
| Enjyn Score | Not scored | Not scored |
| Our experience | Tested | Researched |
Cost per result from our Credit Cost Comparator, prices checked September 2026. Market rating is the public review average; the Enjyn Score is our own grading.
Pick Enrow if
- You enrich inside Clay or a similar stack and want a waterfall
- You prefer paying only when a verified email comes back
- You want a free start: 50 credits, no card
Where it breaks. Enrow is an enrichment engine, not a prospecting database, so it finds and verifies contacts you already have but will not build lists from scratch. As a newer tool it also lacks the third-party review track record that some buyers require before committing.
Full Enrow review →Pick Icypeas if
- You want credits that roll over indefinitely on every plan
- You need a domain scan for role addresses like support@ and info@
- You connect through Make, Zapier or n8n
Where it breaks. Icypeas is built to find and verify emails, not to be a prospecting database. If you need a place to build lists, pull phone numbers, or filter by firmographics, you will still need a separate sourcing tool alongside it.
Full Icypeas review →Our take. We tested Enrow and researched Icypeas; we run neither in production. Neither has enough independent reviews for a consensus score, so the comparison rests on what each vendor publishes. Enrow's pitch is that you never pay for a miss, and its 97%+ verified delivery figure is the vendor's own claim, not ours. Icypeas is deliberately narrow and cheap, with credits that never expire. Both find and verify addresses you already target. Neither builds lists, so you still need a sourcing tool. The honest test is the same for both: run one hundred contacts you already know through each and compare how many verified addresses come back and what they cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
On the entry plans, Enrow's Start is 15 EUR a month for 1,000 credits on annual billing and Icypeas' Basic is $19 for 1,000. The currencies differ, and Enrow only charges when it returns a verified email, so cost per result is what to compare.
Do the credits expire?
Icypeas credits roll over indefinitely. On Enrow, roll-over comes with the Pro plan.
Does either build prospect lists?
No. Both find and verify contacts you already have; pair either with a sourcing tool.
Which fits a Clay workflow?
Enrow is built to slot into Clay and similar enrichment stacks through its API and integrations. Icypeas connects through its API and Make, Zapier and n8n.
Still torn between the two?
We run outbound stacks for B2B teams and pick tools by what they cost per result, not by the pitch.
Book a GTM audit