Lusha Review 2026

Last reviewed June 2026

Lusha

B2B contact & company data with direct dials, from a Chrome extension

Overview

Lusha is a B2B contact-data tool best known for fast access to verified emails and direct-dial phone numbers, mostly via a Chrome extension that overlays LinkedIn and company sites. Its edge is convenience and phone coverage — reviewers praise the ease of use and the quality of contact information, especially direct dials. The trade-offs are accuracy variance and credits: the most common complaints are data inaccuracy and outdated contacts (especially for smaller companies), plus credit limits. It's a contact-data source, not a sender or a full prospecting database. We run Apollo + Ocean.io for data, so this is a researched grade.

Who it's for

→Sales teams that need direct-dial phone numbers fast
→SDRs enriching contacts from LinkedIn via extension
→Teams wanting a quick, easy contact-data layer

Not for

Teams needing the cleanest possible data at scale — accuracy can vary, so verify on your ICP

Capabilities

Verified emails & direct-dial phones
Chrome extension (LinkedIn + web)
Bulk enrichment
Buyer intent signals
Prospecting filters
CRM integrations & API
Team management (higher tiers)

Ratings & reviews

4.3

1,656 reviews ↗

5★

1,034

4★

488

3★

2★

1★

👍 Pros

Contact Information 87Ease of Use 66Accurate Data 61Data Accuracy 54Accuracy 46

👎 Cons

Data Inaccuracy 49Outdated Contacts 36Outdated Data 33Limited Credits 30Inaccurate Data 30

Pricing

Tier	Price	Credits / mo	Notes
Free	Free	—	40 credits/mo · 1 seat · no card required
Starter	$37/mo	—	Billed yearly · 4,800 credits/yr · bulk enrichment
Pro	$52/mo	—	Billed yearly · 7,200 credits/yr · API · signals
Premium	$300/mo	—	Billed yearly · 40,800 credits/yr · 5 seats · team management

Our advice

We've tested Lusha: fast direct-dial phones via the extension are its strength; accuracy variance and credit limits are the catch. Verify a sample against your ICP before committing — for our own data we lean on Apollo + Ocean.io.

How we run it

We don't run Lusha — Apollo and Ocean.io cover data in our stack. We track it as the convenient direct-dial layer for teams that prospect heavily by phone from LinkedIn.

The honest take

Where it breaks

On data accuracy for smaller/niche companies and on credit limits at volume. It's a quick contact-data layer, not a clean enterprise database or a sender.

The verdict

A convenient contact-data tool, strongest for direct-dial phone numbers pulled from LinkedIn. Mind the accuracy variance and credit limits — verify a sample before relying on it at scale.

Integrations

HubSpotSalesforcePipedriveOutreachSalesloftZapier

Alternatives

Apollo

★4.7(9,660)

Starting price

$49/mo

Starting price

Custom

Starting price

$99/mo

✓Free plan

View review→

FAQ

Lusha vs Apollo vs ZoomInfo?

Lusha is strongest for fast direct-dial phone access via extension; Apollo bundles a sequencer, ZoomInfo offers the widest enterprise data. Lusha trades some accuracy for convenience.

How much does Lusha cost?

Free tier (40 credits/mo); paid from ~$37/user/mo (Starter) and ~$52/user/mo (Pro), billed yearly; Premium ~$300/mo for teams.

Is Lusha's data accurate?

Phone/email quality is well-rated, but data inaccuracy and outdated contacts are the most common complaints — verify against your targets.

Who is Lusha for?

Sales teams that need direct-dial phone numbers fast and SDRs enriching contacts from LinkedIn via the extension. Verify accuracy on smaller or niche companies.

Does Lusha have a free plan?

Yes — a free tier, then Starter at $37/mo and Pro at $52/mo, priced on credits.

What are the best Lusha alternatives?

Apollo for database plus sequencing, ZoomInfo for enterprise depth, and UpLead for pay-for-verified accuracy.

We run this stack for B2B teams

Skip the months of trial and error. We build the GTM system that books meetings.

Book a GTM audit →