Lusha Review 2026

Last reviewed September 2026 by Théo Pascard

Lusha

Lusha

B2B contact & company data with direct dials, from a Chrome extension

Overview

Lusha is a B2B contact-data tool best known for fast access to verified emails and direct-dial phone numbers, mostly via a Chrome extension that overlays LinkedIn and company sites. Its edge is convenience and phone coverage — reviewers praise the ease of use and the quality of contact information, especially direct dials. The trade-offs are accuracy variance and credits: the most common complaints are data inaccuracy and outdated contacts (especially for smaller companies), plus credit limits. It's a contact-data source, not a sender or a full prospecting database. We have run it in production as a phone source, where it found a French mobile number that US-centric tools had missed; we don't use it as our prospecting database.

Enjyn Score

iWeighted across 5 axes, computed from public review data (G2, Capterra) and reweighted on our rubric — then overridden on the axes we operate first-hand.
8.6/ 10
Output quality8.6/10
Time-to-value8.6/10
Price-to-value8.6/10
ICP fit (SMB / founder)8.6/10
Reliability & support8.6/10

How we calculate the Enjyn Score →

Who it's for

  • →Sales teams that need direct-dial phone numbers fast
  • →SDRs enriching contacts from LinkedIn via extension
  • →Teams wanting a quick, easy contact-data layer

Not for

Teams needing the cleanest possible data at scale — accuracy can vary, so verify on your ICP

Capabilities

  • Verified emails & direct-dial phones
  • Chrome extension (LinkedIn + web)
  • Bulk enrichment
  • Buyer intent signals
  • Prospecting filters
  • CRM integrations & API
  • Team management (higher tiers)

Ratings & reviews

4.3
1,656 reviews ↗
5★
1,034
4★
488
3★
81
2★
15
1★
38

👍 Pros

Contact Information 87Ease of Use 66Accurate Data 61Data Accuracy 54Accuracy 46

👎 Cons

Data Inaccuracy 49Outdated Contacts 36Outdated Data 33Limited Credits 30Inaccurate Data 30

Pricing

TierPriceCredits / moNotes
FreeFree—40 credits/mo · 1 seat · no card required
Starter$37.45/mo—Billed yearly · 4,800 credits/yr · bulk enrichment
Pro$52.45/mo—Billed yearly · 7,200 credits/yr · 2 seats included · API · signals
Premium$299.95/mo—Billed yearly · 40,800 credits/yr · 5 seats · team management
ScaleCustom—Custom credits and seats for large organisations, 50%+ off the price per credit, SSO. Contact sales (2026-09-18).

Our advice

We've tested Lusha: fast direct-dial phones via the extension are its strength; accuracy variance and credit limits are the catch. Verify a sample against your ICP before committing — for our own data we lean on Apollo + Ocean.io.

How we run it

We use Lusha for one job: mobile numbers, French ones above all. In July 2026 we wired its API into the phone cascade of our own Mobile Finder tool, right behind Apollo, after a test where it returned a French mobile that two US-centric sources had missed. On the free plan the monthly credits covered only a handful of phone lookups, the calls soon came back refused for lack of credit, and we took it out of the automated cascade in September. Our rule is still to try it first when we need a French mobile, looked up by hand rather than by pipeline. We don't use it as a prospecting database. The catch for anyone relying on it at scale is accuracy variance and credit limits: data inaccuracy and outdated contacts are the common complaints, especially on smaller or niche companies, so verify a sample against your ICP first.

The honest take

Where it breaks

On data accuracy for smaller/niche companies and on credit limits at volume. It's a quick contact-data layer, not a clean enterprise database or a sender.

The verdict

A convenient contact-data tool, strongest for direct-dial phone numbers pulled from LinkedIn. Mind the accuracy variance and credit limits — verify a sample before relying on it at scale.

Integrations

HubSpotSalesforcePipedriveOutreachSalesloftZapier

Alternatives

Head-to-head

FAQ

Lusha vs Apollo vs ZoomInfo?

Lusha is strongest for fast direct-dial phone access via extension; Apollo bundles a sequencer, ZoomInfo offers the widest enterprise data. Lusha trades some accuracy for convenience.

How much does Lusha cost?

Lusha is credit-based with a free tier of 40 credits/mo and one seat, no card required. Paid plans are billed yearly: Starter at $37.45/mo (4,800 credits/yr with bulk enrichment), Pro at $52.45/mo (7,200 credits/yr with API and signals), and Premium at $299.95/mo (40,800 credits/yr, 5 seats).

Is Lusha's data accurate?

Phone and email quality is well-rated, and accurate data is among its most-cited strengths. But data inaccuracy and outdated contacts are the most common complaints, especially for smaller or niche companies. Verify a sample against your own ICP before relying on it at scale, since accuracy varies by target.

Who is Lusha for?

Sales teams that need direct-dial phone numbers fast and SDRs enriching contacts from LinkedIn via the extension. Verify accuracy on smaller or niche companies.

Does Lusha have a free plan?

Yes. Lusha's free tier gives 40 credits/mo on one seat with no card required, so you can test it first. Paid plans are credit-based and billed yearly: Starter at $37.45/mo, Pro at $52.45/mo with API and signals, and Premium at $299.95/mo for teams with 5 seats and team management.

What are the best Lusha alternatives?

Apollo for a database plus sequencing in one tool, ZoomInfo for the widest enterprise data depth, and UpLead for pay-for-verified accuracy. Lusha's edge is fast direct-dial phones via its Chrome extension, so the right alternative depends on whether you need broader data, enterprise depth, or cleaner verified records.

Work at Lusha? Get your Enjyn badge →

We run this stack for B2B teams

Skip the months of trial and error. We build the GTM system that books meetings.

Book a GTM audit →